Big River Trial Attorneys

BR over a blue banner that says Big River
Lesiones Personales

Acreditar incapacidad permanente

/

Acreditar Incapacidad Permanente Sufrir lesiones y desarrollar una discapacidad de por vida es, sin duda, algo trágico. Sin embargo, usted puede tener derecho a una indemnización que le ayude a aliviar algunas de las presiones financieras que supone vivir en esta situación. Comprobar incapacidad total y permanente no es algo sencillo, aunque el demandante pueda demostrar fácilmente sus lesiones. Sin embargo, para demostrar la incapacidad total y permanente también requiere que el demandante demuestre cómo afectan las lesiones a su vida y a su futuro, lo que puede ser complicado, ya que requiere de pruebas y testimonios. Un abogado con experiencia puede proporcionar a un demandante la asistencia legal adecuada para así evaluar la necesidad de un testimonio experto para apoyar su demanda. Existen varias maneras de que el demandante apoye su demanda de incapacidad total y permanente con base en las lesiones sufridas. Algunas de las declaraciones críticas para apoyar el caso del demandante pueden ser las siguientes: Diagnóstico Profesional Médico Un diagnóstico oficial por parte de un médico que haya evaluado o tratado al demandante sobre sus lesiones y su incapacidad es una prueba fundamental para demostrar la incapacidad total y permanente. Dado que la demanda por incapacidad total y permanente está ligada al diagnóstico médico del demandante, se requiere el testimonio de un profesional médico en el caso. Para este requisito, el profesional médico aportaría su testimonio oficial sobre la situación médica del demandante en relación con sus lesiones. Algunos de los puntos que el profesional médico puede tratar específicamente incluyen los siguientes: el alcance de las lesiones del demandante cómo las lesiones del demandante han limitado su capacidad para realizar movimientos y actividades específicas cómo obtuvo el demandante los daños y perjuicios cómo han evolucionado las lesiones desde el momento del diagnóstico inicial Si el demandante sufre una incapacidad total y permanente por las lesiones sufridas Testimonio De Perito Profesional Si bien no es obligatorio, el testimonio de un experto profesional puede ser valioso para comprobar el impacto de las lesiones y la discapacidad en el demandante. Un experto profesional puede destacar cómo la discapacidad y las lesiones del demandante le han incapacitado para realizar el mismo trabajo que tenía antes de sufrir sus lesiones. Concretamente, un experto profesional puede completar una evaluación conocida como Evaluación de la Capacidad Funcional (FCE, por sus siglas en inglés) en nombre del demandante. Esta evaluación puede incluir la siguiente información: Si la capacidad física del demandante le incapacita para cumplir con sus responsabilidades laborales anteriores. Además, el experto profesional también puede exponer el tipo de trabajos que pueden ajustarse a la capacidad disminuida de la demandante causada por su discapacidad. Dichas limitaciones físicas pueden incluir la capacidad de agacharse, levantar objetos, permanecer de pie durante cierto tiempo, caminar una determinada distancia o realizar tareas específicas importantes para el trabajo. La capacidad psicológica del demandante, como su capacidad para concentrarse o cumplir los requisitos mentales de su anterior trabajo o qué trabajo se ajustaría a su competencia mental. El experto profesional también puede exponer los limitados puestos de trabajo disponibles para el demandante, teniendo en cuenta su situación y cómo estos trabajos difieren en cuanto a salario, disponibilidad y complejidad del puesto anterior del demandante. Asesor Personal De Salud Otro tipo de testimonio experto que puede resultar valioso para un demandante a la hora de comprobar la incapacidad total y permanente es un asesor personal de salud. Aunque una declaración de un asesor personal de salud no es necesario en una demanda, su testimonio puede ayudar al caso del demandante al poner de relieve el impacto en las necesidades futuras y la calidad de vida en función de las lesiones y la discapacidad que ha sufrido. Los asesores personales de salud son profesionales certificados que evalúan a las personas que padecen problemas de salud y lesiones crónicas, así como las necesidades de la persona en función de sus discapacidades. Concretamente, los asesores personales de salud pueden proporcionar información sobre lo que necesitaría la siguiente persona en función de las lesiones y la discapacidad que padece, entre otras cosas: Si el demandante necesitará rehabilitación o terapia y, en caso afirmativo, de qué tipo y duración prevista del tratamiento. Si el demandante necesitará atención médica de larga duración y, en caso afirmativo, su naturaleza y los profesionales que deben prestar dicha atención y cuidados médicos. Si el demandante necesitará asistencia doméstica y, en caso afirmativo, el alcance del servicio requerido y el tipo de actividades cotidianas para las que necesitaría ayuda. Testimonio Personal El testimonio del propio demandante puede ayudar a demostrar el impacto de las lesiones y la discapacidad que ha sufrido en su calidad de vida. Aunque esta declaración pueda parecer autocomplaciente, puede ayudar a proporcionar una narración personal de lo que está viviendo el demandante. Esta afirmación puede enfatizar los cambios drásticos que han traído a su calidad de vida las lesiones y discapacidades que han sufrido. Algunos de los datos que el demandante puede destacar en su testimonio sobre cómo sus lesiones y su discapacidad han afectado a su vida son los siguientes: Las limitaciones o deformidades físicas que han sufrido. Los cambios en su estado mental y los retos que suponen para sus interacciones y vidas cotidianas. Las complicaciones emocionales provocadas por su discapacidad física y sus lesiones. Se debe tener en cuenta que la incapacidad total y permanente para las demandas por lesiones personales no es lo mismo que una demanda de Seguro Social por discapacidad (SSD). Las reclamaciones por incapacidad ofrecen diferentes tipos de recursos económicos y de otro tipo. Se debe tener en cuenta que la obtención de una solicitud de SSD puede afectar a su capacidad para recibir otros tipos de compensación, como las prestaciones de compensación de los trabajadores. Demostrar suficientemente la incapacidad permanente puede repercutir drásticamente en la cantidad recuperada en una demanda por daños personales y en los daños recuperables. Un abogado experto en lesiones personales podrá ayudarle a analizar si puede tener un caso por incapacidad temporal o

Personal Injury

Proving Permanent Disability

/

Proving Permanent Disability Sustaining injuries and developing a lifelong disability is a tragic thing to go through. However you may be eligible for compensation to help alleviate some of the financial burdens of living with this predicament. Proving total and permanent disability is not simple, even if the claimant can easily show their injuries. Instead, proving total and permanent disability also requires the claimant to show how the injuries impact their lives and future, which can be complicated as it requires supporting evidence and testimony. An experienced attorney may be able to provide a claimant with the proper legal assistance to evaluate the need for expert testimony to support their claim. There are various ways for the claimant to support their claim of total and permanent disability based on their sustained injuries. Some of the critical statements to support the claimant’s case may include the following: Medical Professional Diagnosis An official diagnosis by a medical professional that has evaluated or treated the claimant on their injuries and disability is a critical source in proving total and permanent disability. Given that the claim for total and permanent disability is tied to the claimant’s medical diagnosis, a medical professional’s testimony is required in the case. For this requirement, the medical professional would provide their official testimony regarding the claimant’s medical standing regarding their injuries. Some of the points that the medical professional can discuss specifically may include the following: the extent of the claimant’s injuries how the claimant’s injuries have limited their ability to perform specific movements and activities how the claimant obtained the damages how the injuries have progressed since the time of the initial diagnosis If the claimant is suffering from total and permanent disability from the injuries sustained Vocational Expert Testimony Although it is not required, testimony by a vocational expert may be valuable in proving the impact of the injuries and disability on the claimant. A vocational expert can highlight how the claimant’s disability and injuries have rendered them unable to do the same job they used to have before they sustained their injuries. Specifically, a vocational expert may be able to complete an evaluation known as a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) on behalf of the claimant. This evaluation may include the following information: Whether the claimant’s physical ability will render them unable to fulfill their previous job responsibilities. Moreover, the vocational expert can also lay out the type of jobs that may fit the claimant’s diminished capability caused by their disability. Such physical limitations may include the ability to bend, lift, stand for a certain amount of time, walk for a certain distance, or perform specific duties vital to the job. The claimant’s psychological capacity, such as their ability to focus or fulfill the mental requirement for their previous job or what job would fit their mental competence. The vocational expert can also lay out the limited jobs available to the claimant, given their predicament and how these jobs differ in salary, availability, and complexities from the claimant’s previous position. Life Care Planner Another source of expert testimony that may prove to be valuable to a claimant in proving total and permanent disability is a life care planner. Although a statement from a life care planner is not required in a lawsuit, their testimony can help the claimant’s case in highlighting the impact on the future needs and quality of life-based on the injuries and disability they have incurred. Life care planners are certified professionals who assess individuals suffering from chronic health issues and injuries and evaluate the individual’s needs based on their disabilities. Specifically, life care planners can provide insight on what the following individual would need based on the injuries and disability they are suffering from, including the following: Whether the claimant will need rehabilitation or therapy, and if so, what type, projected length of treatment. If the claimant will need to avail of long-term medical care, and if so, the nature of the care, the professionals that need to provide such medical attention and care. Whether the claimant will need to seek domestic assistance, and if so, the extent of the required service and the type of day-to-day activities they would require aid with. Personal Testimony A claimant’s own testimony can help in showing the impact of the injuries and disability they have sustained on their quality of life. Although this statement may seem self-serving, it can help provide a personal narrative of what the claimant is going through. This statement can emphasize the drastic changes brought to their quality of life by the injuries and disabilities they have sustained. Some of the information that the claimant can highlight in their testimony on how their injuries and disability have affected their lives are as follows: The physical limitations or deformities they have sustained. Changes in their mental state and the challenges they pose to their daily interactions and lives. The emotional complications brought on by their physical disability and injuries. It should be noted that total and permanent disability for personal injury claims is not the same as a Social Security Disability (SSD) claim. Disability claims provide different types of financial and other remedies.  It is worth noting that obtaining an SSD claim can impact your ability to receive other types of compensation such worker’s compensation benefits. Sufficiently proving permanent disability can dramatically impac the amount recovered in a personal injury claim and the damages recoverable. An experienced personal injury attorney will be able to help you analyze whether you may have a claim for a temporary or permanent disability and the type of evidence needed to prove your claim. If you or a loved one and are concerned about whether an injury may have a lifelong impact, please give us a call at (225) 963-9638, or you can click here to contact us for a free consultation. Our highly experienced attorneys can help you assess your case and represent your legal interests.

Defensa Criminal

Sentencias suspendidas y diferidas en Luisiana

/

Sentencias Suspendidas Y Diferidas En Luisiana Una condena por un delito menor o un delito grave en su historial puede suponer graves desventajas en la vida de una persona, ya que una condena aparecería en cualquier comprobación de antecedentes realizada a su nombre. Por lo general, una condena puede limitar la capacidad de una persona para obtener determinadas licencias, acceder a un puesto de trabajo, tener oportunidades de vivienda o recibir asistencia pública. Por muy desafortunado que sea, las condenas suelen estar asociadas a un particular estigma social. Por lo tanto, puede ser valioso para un individuo tener su delito menor, delito grave, o la condena por DUI/DWI aplazada o suspendida y, posiblemente, eventualmente obtener la desestimación, si es posible, en virtud de los artículos 893 y 894. ¿Qué Es El Artículo 893 Del Procedimiento Penal De Luisiana? El artículo 893 del Código de Procedimiento Penal de Luisiana se aplica únicamente a las condenas por primer delito. En virtud de este artículo, un acusado de un delito grave que se declare culpable puede hacer que su condena sea anulada y desestimada para evitar el tiempo de prisión. En lugar de cumplir una condena en prisión, una persona condenada por un delito grave será puesta bajo la supervisión de la libertad condicional y la libertad vigilada durante al menos un año pero no más de tres, excepto en los programas que se comentan a continuación. ¿Existen Excepciones Al Límite De Tres Años De Libertad Condicional En Virtud Del Artículo 893? Sí, Los Hay. Una excepción al límite de tres años es si el tribunal determina que la finalización con éxito de uno de los programas que se enumeran a continuación puede requerir un período de libertad condicional que supere el límite de tres años, pero no más de ocho. Rehabilitaciónn de drogas del tribunal de distrito Programa establecido del tribunal de conducción en estado de embriaguez o del tribunal de sobriedad Programa del Tribunal de Salud Mental Programa del Tribunal de Veteranos Programa del Tribunal de Reintegración Programa Piloto de Libertad Condicional Rápida y Cierta Otra excepción es si el acusado no ha cumplido los términos y condiciones de su libertad condicional. En tales circunstancias, el tribunal puede prorrogar el periodo de prueba si no supera los dos años. ¿Quién Puede Obtener La Suspensión O El Aplazamiento De Una Condena Por Delito Grave En Virtud Del Artículo 893? En Virtud Del Artículo 893, Sólo Los Cargos Por Delitos No Violentos Y Delitos No Capitales Pueden Ser Aplazados O Suspendidos. Además, el artículo 893 sólo permite suspender o aplazar las condenas por primer delito. Esto significa que si usted tiene una condena por un delito grave anterior, se consideraría inelegible para obtener su condena por delito grave actual diferida o suspendida. ¿Existe Un Límite A La Frecuencia Con La Que Un Acusado Puede Utilizar El Artículo 893? Sí, Lo Hay. De acuerdo con el artículo 893, los cargos por delitos graves de una persona puede ser suspendida o aplazada sólo una vez. ¿Qué Es El Artículo 894 Para Delitos Menores Y DUI/DWI En Luisiana? En virtud del artículo 894 del Procedimiento Penal de Luisiana, una persona acusada de DWI/DUI o de un delito menor, con ciertas excepciones, puede conseguir que se desestime su condena declarándose culpable del cargo y cumpliendo las condiciones de su libertad condicional. El artículo 894 también permite que la persona renuncie a cumplir la pena de cárcel si acepta estar en libertad condicional. Sin embargo, es importante tener en cuenta que el juez puede denegar la aplicación del artículo 894 si el individuo vuelve a ser detenido, es condenado por cualquier cargo durante la libertad condicional o no cumple la orden de libertad condicional. También se puede ordenar al individuo que pague toda la restitución y que cumpla con los demás términos de la libertad condicional que se le haya impuesto. Por otro lado, si el acusado ha completado la libertad condicional de acuerdo con la orden del tribunal, entonces el juez concederá la aplicación del artículo 894, anulará la condena y desestimará el caso contra el individuo. ¿Quién Es Elegible Para Tener Un Delito Menor O Condenas Por DWI/DUI Diferidas O Suspendidas Bajo El Artículo 894? Generalmente, la mayoría de los cargos por delitos menores y las condenas por DUI/DWI son elegibles para ser diferidos o suspendidos bajo el Artículo 894. Sin embargo, las siguientes excepciones no son elegibles: Abandono criminal de la familia Acecho Agresión o abuso doméstico Delitos sexuales ¿Quién Decide Si Un Individuo Puede Aplicar El Artículo 894 A Sus Cargos? Tal como se ha señalado anteriormente, la mayoría de los cargos por delitos menores y DWI/DUI son elegibles bajo el artículo 894. Sin embargo, estar cualificado no es una garantía que haga que el tribunal aplique el artículo 894. En cambio, la aplicación del artículo 894 en una acusación de delito menor o de DWI/DUI se basa únicamente en la discreción del juez. Al fin y al cabo, ninguna ley existente en Luisiana obliga a un juez a aplicar el artículo 894. Para decidir si aplica el artículo 894 en un caso concreto, el juez utiliza varios factores, que pueden incluir, entre otros, la naturaleza del delito, los hechos y las circunstancias que rodean la acusación, o si el acusado tiene detenciones y condenas anteriores o pendientes. ¿Existen Límites En El Uso Del Artículo 894 Para Delitos Menores Y Cargos De DUI/DWI? Sí, La Aplicación Del Artículo 894 Tiene Sus Límites. Por lo general, una persona está limitada a conseguir el aplazamiento o la suspensión de sus condenas por delitos menores en virtud del artículo 894 una vez cada cinco años. En comparación, el artículo 894 sólo puede aplicarse a las condenas por DUI/DWI cada diez años. ¿Pueden Estos Cargos Ser Desestimados Después Del Período De Libertad Condicional En Virtud Del Artículo 893 O 894? Probablemente. Una vez completada la libertad condicional, el tribunal puede anular la condena y desestimar los cargos del individuo. Un delito menor, DUI/DWI, o un cargo de

Criminal Defense

Suspended and Deferred Sentences in Louisiana

/

Suspended And Deferred Sentences In Louisiana A misdemeanor or a felony conviction on your record may pose serious disadvantages in a person’s life since a conviction would show on any background check conducted in your name. Generally, a conviction can limit an individual’s ability to obtain specific licenses, job eligibility, housing opportunities, or receive public assistance. As unfortunate as it is, convictions are often associated with a particular social stigma. Therefore, it may be valuable for an individual to have their misdemeanor, felony, or DUI/DWI conviction deferred or suspended and possibly eventually get dismissed, if possible, under Articles 893 and 894. What Is The Louisiana Criminal Procedure Article 893? The Louisiana Criminal Procedure Article 893 applies only to first-time felony convictions. Under this Article, a felony defendant who plead guilty can have their conviction set aside and dismissed to avoid prison time. Instead of serving time in prison, a person convicted of a felony will be placed under the supervision of parole and probation for at least one year but no more than three years, except for the programs discussed below. Are There Exceptions To The Three-Year Limit Of Probation Under Article 893? Yes, There Are. An exception to the three-year limit is if the court determined that the successful completion of one of the programs listed below may require a period of probation that exceeds the three-year limit but no longer than eight years. Drug division of the district court Established driving while intoxicated court or sobriety court program Mental Health Court Program Veterans Court Program Re-entry Court Program Swift and Certain Probation Pilot Program Another exception is if the defendant has failed to complete the terms and conditions of their probation. In such circumstances, the court may extend the probation period if it does not exceed two years. Who Is Eligible To Get A Felony Conviction Suspended Or Deferred Under Article 893? Under Article 893, Only Non-Violent Felony And Non-Capital Felony Charges Are Eligible To Be Deferred Or Suspended. Moreover, only first-time felony convictions are allowed to be suspended or deferred under Article 893. This means that if you have a previous felony conviction, you would be deemed ineligible to get your current felony conviction deferred or suspended. Is There A Limit To How Often A Defendant Can Use Article 893? Yes, There Is. Under Article 893, an individual can have their felony charges suspended or deferred only once. What Is Article 894 For Misdemeanors And DUI/DWI In Louisiana? Under the Louisiana Criminal Procedure Article 894, an individual charged with a DWI/DUI or misdemeanor, with certain exceptions, could get their conviction dismissed by pleading guilty to the charge and completing the conditions of their probation. Article 894 also allows the individual to forgo serving time in jail by agreeing to be under probation. However, it is essential to note that the judge may deny the application of Article 894 if the individual gets re-arrested, convicted of any charge during probation, or fails to complete the probation order. The individual may also be ordered to pay all restitution and comply with the other terms of the probation imposed on them. On the other hand, if the defendant has completed the probation according to the court’s order, then the judge would grant the applicatio Who Is Eligible To Have A Misdemeanor Or DWI/DUI Convictions Deferred Or Suspended Under Article 894? Generally, most misdemeanor charges and DUI/DWI convictions are eligible to be deferred or suspended under Article 894. However, the following exceptions are deemed to be ineligible: Criminal neglect of family Stalking Domestic abuse battery Sex offenses Who Decides If An Individual Will Get To Apply Article 894 On Their Charges? As noted above, most misdemeanor and DWI/DUI charges are eligible under Article 894. However, being qualified is not a guarantee that gets the court to apply Article 894. Instead, the application of Article 894 in a misdemeanor or DWI/DUI charge is solely based on the judge’s discretion. After all, no existing law in Louisiana requires a judge to apply Article 894. In deciding whether to apply Article 894 in a specific case, the judge uses various factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the nature of the crime, facts and circumstances surrounding the charge, or whether the defendant has previous or pending arrests and convictions. Are There Limits To Using Article 894 For Misdemeanors And DUI/DWI Charges? Yes, There Are Limits To Applying Article 894. Generally, a person is limited to getting their misdemeanor convictions deferred or suspended under Article 894 once every five years. In comparison, Article 894 can only be applied to DUI/DWI convictions every ten years. Can These Charges Be Dismissed After The Probation Period Under Article 893 Or 894? It Is Possible. Upon completing their probation, the court may set aside a conviction and dismiss the individual’s charges. A misdemeanor, DUI/DWI, or felony charge can severely affect an individual’s life. Thus, it is vital to apply the benefits of getting misdemeanor, DUI/DWI, or felony charges deferred or suspended under Articles 893 or 894. If you or your loved one is involved in a misdemeanor, DUI/DWI, or felony charge, you should speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney to see if requesting relief under Article 893 or 894 will be possible in your case. You can call (225) 963-9638, or you can click here to contact us for a free consultation. Our highly experienced criminal lawyers can help you assess your case and represent your interests.

Criminal Defense

Schedule I Drug Charges in Louisiana

/

Schedule I Drug Charges In Louisiana Today we’re going to be talking about a schedule 1 charge in Louisiana. So in Louisiana there are five drug schedules. These are found at Louisiana Revised Statute 40:963 and there’s a link in the description. This video is about possession and possession with intent a schedule 1. Now the list of schedules are found at Louisiana Revised Statute 40:964. We also have a link to that in the description. Schedule ones typically include things like opiates, opium derivatives, hallucinogenics. depressants, stimulants. The most common schedule 1 charges we see are Heroin, MDMA or Ecstasy, LSD or Acid, Marijuana and THC whether synthetic or natural. The criteria for something to be a schedule 1 is that there is a high probability of abuse, there’s no accepted medical use, and there’s a lack of safety protocol for use with medical supervision. Now determining the sentence that you might be looking at can be pretty complex It depends on the amount of the drug and the type of the drug. Penalties for different schedule 1 charges are found at Louisiana Revised Statute 40:966 and we have a link in the description. Talking about are some examples of the sentences on a first conviction of a possession of less than 14 grams of marijuana, it’s a $100 fine. A second conviction of less than 14 grams of marijuana is a fine of up to a $1,000 and up to six months in jail. A first conviction of 14 grams or more of marijuana is up to six months in jail and a $500 fine. Now a conviction for up to two and a half pounds of Marijuana, THC, or any synthetics is one to ten years in jail and up to a $50,000 fine. Now contrast that with say like Heroin. Heroin is also a schedule 1 but a conviction of less than 28 grams of Heroin is one to ten years in jail and a fine of up to $50,000. These are just a few examples we’re not covering the entire list this video would take way too long. But if you want to determine the sentence that you might be facing you should check the statutes listed in the description. Now of course there are defenses. Marijuana is actually now prescribed for some medicinal uses and that that is something that’s very in flux in this country right now and it’s also in flux in Louisiana. There are other defenses that maybe the amount is actually less than what the police officer put in the report. Maybe the lab test came back and it wasn’t the drug that they say it was. Or you know maybe it wasn’t yours. Maybe it was found in a vehicle with three or four people in the vehicle and it didn’t belong to you. So the types of defenses that you might have, and the actual sentence that you might be facing are all things that you should discuss with the best criminal defense lawyer that you can find. Link To Louisiana Revised Statute 40:963: Http://Legis.La.Gov/Legis/Law.Aspx?D=98876 Link To Louisiana Revised Statute 40:964: Http://Legis.La.Gov/Legis/Law.Aspx?D=98877 Link To Louisiana Revised Statute 40:966: Http://Legis.La.Gov/Legis/Law.Aspx?D=98880

Criminal Defense

All About Louisiana Drug Court Programs

/

All About Louisiana Drug Court Programs According to the Bureau of Justice report in 2017, an estimated 21% of incarcerated individuals in state and local jails are sentenced for crimes related to obtaining drugs or money for drugs; while over 40% of people incarcerated for property crimes and 14% of people incarcerated for violent crimes stems from drug-related reasons. According to data from the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, as of October 2000 total prison population was 35,998, of which over 30 percent are incarcerated for drug-related crimes. Although it is not further determined the exact nature of the drug-related crimes for this data, it is noted in the report that a significant number of the 30 percent population are for charges that often have a root cause in drug abuse or distribution. Given these high numbers of drug and alcohol-related crimes, the Louisiana legislature has created the Drug Diversion Probation Program, commonly referred to as Drug Court. Under the statute, district courts operate and provide for drug and alcohol treatment programs through drug diversions. Essentially, the drug court’s goal is curtailing crimes attributed to drugs and alcohol. Thus, they created the Drug Diversion Probation Program to implement the legislature’s purposes. Who Are Eligible To Participate In The Drug Diversion Probation Program? For a defendant to be eligible for the drug diversion probation program, they must satisfy the following criteria: The defendant must not have any prior felony convictions for any offenses classified as a crime of violence; The defendant’s current charge cannot be a crime of violence, including domestic violence; driving under the influence of alcohol or any drugs that have resulted in the death of a person; or multiple counts of distribution, possession with intent to distribute, production, manufacture, or cultivation of dangerous controlled substances; The defendant must not have any other pending criminal proceedings that involve the commission of a crime of violence; If the defendant has a record of one or more felonies, then the defendant must not have been convicted of aggravated burglary or simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling; However, eligibility based on the criteria above is not sufficient to get into the drug diversion probation program. As discussed below, the judge decides whether a defendant can be accepted to the program. Who Makes The Final Determination If The Defendant Is Eligible To Participate In The Drug Diversion Probation Program? The judge decides whether the defendant is eligible to participate in the drug diversion probation program. To make a proper determination on the suitability of the defendant for the drug diversion probation program, the judge would assess numerous factors, including the recommendations of the district attorney and the defense counsel, the Examiner’s report, and other relevant information, including but not limited to: Nature of the crime charged and the circumstances involved in the crime; Whether the defendant is a first-time offender of a crime related to alcohol or drug-related offense, if the defendant has previously participated in the same or similar program, and whether they have shown any degree of success in the previous treatment program; The probability that the defendant will willfully participate and benefit from the program; Whether the program is appropriate to meet the needs of the defendant; Impact on the community of the defendant’s probation and treatment; Recommendations, if any, of the involved law enforcement agency or victim; Likelihood of obtaining restitution from the defendant throughout their probation; If there are any mitigating circumstances; Other circumstances that are reasonably related to the defendant’s case. The judge shall state their reasons for the record if they decide to reject the defendant from participating in the drug diversion probation program. What Criteria Does The District Attorney Use To Make Their Recommendation? As mentioned above, the district attorney recommends whether a defendant is deemed eligible to participate in the program to the court. The criteria used by the district attorney to determine whether they would recommend a defendant to be admitted to the drug diversion probation program are as follows: If the defendant is charged with using and possessing any narcotic drugs, coca leaves, marijuana, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogenic drugs, or significant association with alcohol or drug use, or both; If the district attorney has a reason to believe that the defendant suffers from alcohol or drug addiction, or both; and If the district attorney believes that it is in the best interest of the community and justice to provide the defendant with treatment to their addition instead of incarceration or other sanctions. What Is The Examiner’s Report, And What Does It Entail? As stated above, the judge uses an Examiner’s Report to determine whether a defendant is eligible to participate in the drug diversion probation program. The Examiner’s report is ordered by the court and is conducted by one of the court’s designated licensed treatment programs. These treatment programs are certified and approved by the State of Louisiana, and they have experience working with criminal justice clients suffering from alcohol or drug-related addictions. The report examines the defendant using standardized testing and evaluation protocols to assess whether the defendant is an eligible candidate for a treatment program. Generally, only defendants determined by the report to suffer from alcoholism or drug addiction, or both, or if they are in danger of developing alcohol or drug dependency and likely to be rehabilitated through treatment, can be considered for treatment. In addition, the Examiner may request the following information from the defendant and use these as part of their recommendation: Any prior criminal charges Educational, working or training background Family history, including their residence or ties in the community Medical and mental history, including treatments Any other information that is reasonably related to determining the treatment program’s success. In addition to the defendant’s eligibility, the Examiner’s Report would include a recommendation to the court of the level of care and length of stay for the defendant. The report’s recommendation will be forwarded to the court and the district attorney. Does The Defendant Waive

Defensa Criminal

Todo sobre los programas de los tribunales de drogas de Luisiana

/

  Todo Sobre Los Programas De Los Tribunales De Drogas De Luisiana Según el informe de la Oficina de Justicia en 2017, se estima que el 21% de las personas encarceladas en las cárceles estatales y locales son condenadas por delitos relacionados con la obtención de drogas o de dinero asociadas con las drogas; mientras que más del 40% de las personas encarceladas por delitos contra la propiedad y el 14% de las personas encarceladas por delitos violentos provienen de motivos relacionados con las drogas. Según datos del Departamento de Seguridad Pública y Correccional de Luisiana, en octubre de 2000 la población penitenciaria total era de 35,998 personas, de las cuales más del 30% están encarceladas por delitos relacionados con las drogas. Aunque no se determina la naturaleza exacta de los delitos relacionados con las drogas para estos datos, se observa en el informe que un número significativo de la población del 30% son por cargos que a menudo tienen una causa de origen en el abuso o la distribución de drogas. Dado el elevado número de delitos relacionados con las drogas y el alcohol, el poder legislativo de Luisiana ha desarrollado el Programa de Libertad Condicional para la rehabilitación de Drogas, comúnmente conocido como Tribunal de Drogas. De acuerdo con la ley, los tribunales de distrito gestionan y proporcionan programas de tratamiento de drogas y alcohol a través de desviaciones de drogas. Esencialmente, el objetivo del tribunal de drogas es reducir los delitos atribuidos a las drogas y el alcohol. Por ello, crearon el Programa de Libertad Condicional para la rehabilitación de drogas para poner en práctica los propósitos del legislador. ¿Quiénes Pueden Participar En El Programa De Libertad Condicional Para La Rehabilitación De Drogas? Para que un acusado pueda acogerse al programa de libertad condicional para la rehabilitación de drogas, debe cumplir los siguientes criterios: El demandado no debe tener ninguna condena previa por cualquier delito clasificado como crimen de violencia; El cargo actual del acusado no puede ser un delito de violencia, incluida la violencia doméstica; manejar bajo la influencia del alcohol o de cualquier droga que haya provocado la muerte de una persona; o múltiples cargos de distribución, posesión con intención de distribuir, producción, fabricación o cultivo de sustancias controladas peligrosas; El acusado no debe tener ningún otro proceso penal pendiente que implique la comisión de un delito de violencia; Si el acusado tiene antecedentes por uno o más delitos graves, no debe haber sido condenado por robo agravado o por robo simple de una vivienda habitada; Sin embargo, la elegibilidad basada en los criterios anteriores no es suficiente para participar en el programa de libertad condicional de desviación de drogas. Tal como se explica más adelante, el juez decide si un acusado puede ser aceptado en el programa. ¿Quién Toma La Decisión Final Si El Acusado Es Elegible Para Participar En El Programa De Libertad Condicional De Rehabilitación De Drogas? El juez decide si el acusado puede participar en el programa de libertad condicional de desviación de drogas. Para tomar una decisión adecuada sobre la idoneidad del acusado para el programa de libertad condicional de desviación de drogas, el juez evaluaría numerosos factores, incluidas las recomendaciones del fiscal y del abogado defensor, el informe del Examinador y otra información pertinente, entre otras cosas: La naturaleza del delito imputado y sus circunstancias; Las características o circunstancias únicas del acusado; Si el acusado es la primera vez que comete un delito relacionado con el alcohol o las drogas, si el acusado ha participado previamente en el mismo programa o en uno similar, y si ha mostrado algún grado de éxito en el programa de tratamiento anterior; La probabilidad de que el acusado participe voluntariamente y se beneficie del programa; Si el programa es adecuado para satisfacer las necesidades del acusado; Impacto en la comunidad de la libertad condicional y el tratamiento del acusado; Recomendaciones, si las hay, de las fuerzas del orden implicadas o de la víctima; Probabilidad de obtener la restitución del acusado a lo largo de su libertad condicional; Si existen circunstancias atenuantes; Otras circunstancias que estén razonablemente relacionadas con el caso del acusado. El juez expondrá sus razones para que conste en acta si decide rechazar la participación del acusado en el programa de libertad condicional para la desviación de drogas. ¿Qué Criterios Utiliza El Fiscal Para Hacer Su Recomendación? Tal como se ha mencionado anteriormente, el fiscal del distrito recomienda al tribunal si un acusado es considerado apto para participar en el programa. Los criterios utilizados por el fiscal del distrito para determinar si recomiendan que un acusado sea admitido en el programa de libertad condicional de desviación de drogas son los siguientes: Si el acusado es acusado de usar y poseer cualquier estupefaciente, hojas de coca, marihuana, estimulantes, depresores, drogas alucinógenas, o asociación significativa con el uso de alcohol o drogas, o ambos; Si el fiscal tiene motivos para creer que el acusado sufre de adicción al alcohol o a las drogas, o de ambas cosas; y Si el fiscal considera que es en el mejor interés de la comunidad y de la justicia proporcionar al acusado un tratamiento a su adición en lugar del encarcelamiento u otras sanciones. ¿Qué Es El Informe Del Examinador Y En Qué Consiste? Tal como ya se ha dicho, el juez utiliza un Informe del Examinador para determinar si un acusado es elegible para participar en el programa de libertad condicional de desviación de drogas. El informe del examinador es ordenado por el tribunal y es realizado por uno de los programas de tratamiento autorizados por el tribunal. Estos programas de tratamiento están certificados y aprobados por el Estado de Luisiana, y tienen experiencia en trabajar con clientes de la justicia penal que sufren adicciones relacionadas con el alcohol o las drogas. El informe examina al acusado utilizando pruebas estandarizadas y protocolos de evaluación para valorar si es un candidato elegible para un programa de tratamiento. Por lo general, sólo se puede considerar la posibilidad

Defensa Criminal

¿Qué es un programa de intervención previa al juicio?

/

All About Pre-Trial Intervention Programs Being arrested and accused of a crime does not necessarily mean you will have a criminal conviction on your record. One way to avoid having a criminal conviction is to beat your case at trial. Another way to avoid having a criminal conviction on you record is to enter into a pretrial diversion program that may be offered through the local District Attorney’s Office. However, getting into one of these programs is not automatic. Different parishes have different rules about who gets accepted and the program conditions vary from parish to parish. What Is The Pretrial Diversion Program Or Pretrial Intervention (PTI)? The pretrial diversion program is also known as pretrial intervention or DA probation. This program allows first-time offenders of non-violent charges to get their charges dismissed and avoid serving jail or prison time in exchange for either: Agreeing with the prosecutor or DA’s office to pay a fine, take some classes, perhaps do community service, and the charges get dismissed; or Enroll in the program and get the charges dismissed The ultimate goal of the pretrial diversion program is to keep first-time non-violent offenders out of the criminal justice system by diverting them to get the rehabilitation treatment they need to prevent them from committing future criminal charges. Does The Defendant Have To Plead Guilty To Participate In The Pretrial Diversion Program? No, the defendant would not have to plead guilty to be admitted to the pretrial diversion program. Who Is Eligible For The Pretrial Diversion Program? However, the specific conditions that a defendant must meet to gain eligibility for the pretrial diversion program are as follows: The charge is a non-violent offense. The defendant has no prior felony convictions. The defendant does not have any or more than one prior misdemeanor conviction, of which the misdemeanor conviction must not be a violent crime or drug-related or was not an original felony charge that is reduced to a misdemeanor. The current charge is not the same as the initial misdemeanor charge. The defendant has not previously completed the pretrial diversion program. The defendant has not previously been terminated or rejected from the pretrial diversion program. An exception is if the defendant was dismissed from the program because they could not be located due to miscommunication. The defendant has no outstanding warrants or charges. The victim has approved the defendant’s admission to the pretrial diversion program. Are Eligible Defendants Automatically Offered To Participate In The Pretrial Diversion Program? No. The defendant has no absolute right to get offered or be admitted to the pretrial diversion program even if they are eligible. Instead, it is solely up to the prosecutor’s office to provide a defendant an opportunity to participate in the program. The prosecutor evaluates each case individually and assesses numerous factors to determine whether they could extend an offer to the defendant to be admitted to the pretrial diversion program. Some of the factors that the prosecutor may use to evaluate the defendant may include but are not limited to the nature of the crime, any mitigating factors, any prior offenses or criminal history, and the surrounding facts of the case. Since a defendant could not automatically be offered to participate in the pretrial diversion program, it is valuable to have a reputable and highly experienced criminal attorney to appeal the defendant’s interest to the prosecutor. How Long Is The Pretrial Diversion Program? Generally, the length of the program lasts between six months to a year. However, the total length of the pretrial diversion program highly depends on the nature of the crime charged to the defendant. Are There Any Costs For Participating In The Pretrial Diversion Program? Yes, there are costs associated with participating in the pretrial diversion program, and the defendant must bear these costs. However, if the defendant could prove that they are indigent, then the prosecutor would modify the charges associated with the pretrial diversion program. How Much Does It Cost To Participate In The Pretrial Diversion Program? The general costs charged to the defendant to enter the pretrial diversion program are as follows: For non-drug-related charges, there is an administration supervision fee of $30 per month, a $35 fee for random drug testing, charges for classes or services the defendant must attend, and any restitution owed. Moreover, there is a $200 enrollment fee for misdemeanors plus $50 for each additional charge and a $100 evaluation charge. There is a $400 enrollment fee for felonies, plus $50 for each additional charge and a $250 evaluation charge. For drug-related charges, there is a minimum fee of $35 for the required random drug screening and charges for any classes and services required of the defendant. Specifically for misdemeanor charges, there is a $500 enrollment fee and a $250 drug evaluation fee, whereas there is a $1,000 enrollment fee and a $375 drug evaluation fee for felony charges. For DUI/DWI charges, there is a $1,000 enrollment fee, fees for the required alcohol screening and monitoring, charges for any required services or classes imposed on the defendant, and a $30 monthly administrative fee. Participating in the pretrial diversion program provides a valuable opportunity for a defendant. However, having the chance to be admitted to this program may be difficult since it is strictly up to the prosecutor of the case. Thus, availing of the legal guidance and representation by a reputable criminal lawyer may provide valuable assistance to your cause as they can negotiate with the prosecutor and present reasons that you may be a good candidate for the program. If you or your loved one has been accused of a charge, and would like to know about the chances of getting into a pretrial diversion program, please call (225) 963-9638, or you can click here to contact us for a free consultation. Our highly experienced criminal lawyers can help you assess your case and represent your interests.

Criminal Defense

All About Pre-Trial Intervention Programs

/

Being arrested and accused of a crime does not necessarily mean you will have a criminal conviction on your record. One way to avoid having a criminal conviction is to beat your case at trial. Another way to avoid having a criminal conviction on you record is to enter into a pretrial diversion program that may be offered through the local District Attorney’s Office. However, getting into one of these programs is not automatic. Different parishes have different rules about who gets accepted and the program conditions vary from parish to parish. What is the Pretrial Diversion Program or Pretrial Intervention (PTI)? The pretrial diversion program is also known as pretrial intervention or DA probation. This program allows first-time offenders of non-violent charges to get their charges dismissed and avoid serving jail or prison time in exchange for either: Agreeing with the prosecutor or DA’s office to pay a fine, take some classes, perhaps do community service, and the charges get dismissed; or Enroll in the program and get the charges dismissed The ultimate goal of the pretrial diversion program is to keep first-time non-violent offenders out of the criminal justice system by diverting them to get the rehabilitation treatment they need to prevent them from committing future criminal charges. Does the Defendant Have to Plead Guilty To Participate in the Pretrial Diversion Program? No, the defendant would not have to plead guilty to be admitted to the pretrial diversion program. Who is Eligible for the Pretrial Diversion Program? However, the specific conditions that a defendant must meet to gain eligibility for the pretrial diversion program are as follows: The charge is a non-violent offense. The defendant has no prior felony convictions. The defendant does not have any or more than one prior misdemeanor conviction, of which the misdemeanor conviction must not be a violent crime or drug-related or was not an original felony charge that is reduced to a misdemeanor. The current charge is not the same as the initial misdemeanor charge. The defendant has not previously completed the pretrial diversion program. The defendant has not previously been terminated or rejected from the pretrial diversion program. An exception is if the defendant was dismissed from the program because they could not be located due to miscommunication. The defendant has no outstanding warrants or charges. The victim has approved the defendant’s admission to the pretrial diversion program. Are Eligible Defendants Automatically Offered to Participate in the Pretrial Diversion Program? No. The defendant has no absolute right to get offered or be admitted to the pretrial diversion program even if they are eligible. Instead, it is solely up to the prosecutor’s office to provide a defendant an opportunity to participate in the program. The prosecutor evaluates each case individually and assesses numerous factors to determine whether they could extend an offer to the defendant to be admitted to the pretrial diversion program. Some of the factors that the prosecutor may use to evaluate the defendant may include but are not limited to the nature of the crime, any mitigating factors, any prior offenses or criminal history, and the surrounding facts of the case. Since a defendant could not automatically be offered to participate in the pretrial diversion program, it is valuable to have a reputable and highly experienced criminal attorney to appeal the defendant’s interest to the prosecutor. How Long is the Pretrial Diversion Program? Generally, the length of the program lasts between six months to a year. However, the total length of the pretrial diversion program highly depends on the nature of the crime charged to the defendant. Are There Any Costs for Participating in the Pretrial Diversion Program? Yes, there are costs associated with participating in the pretrial diversion program, and the defendant must bear these costs. However, if the defendant could prove that they are indigent, then the prosecutor would modify the charges associated with the pretrial diversion program. How Much Does It Cost to Participate in the Pretrial Diversion Program? The general costs charged to the defendant to enter the pretrial diversion program are as follows: For non-drug-related charges, there is an administration supervision fee of $30 per month, a $35 fee for random drug testing, charges for classes or services the defendant must attend, and any restitution owed. Moreover, there is a $200 enrollment fee for misdemeanors plus $50 for each additional charge and a $100 evaluation charge. There is a $400 enrollment fee for felonies, plus $50 for each additional charge and a $250 evaluation charge. For drug-related charges, there is a minimum fee of $35 for the required random drug screening and charges for any classes and services required of the defendant. Specifically for misdemeanor charges, there is a $500 enrollment fee and a $250 drug evaluation fee, whereas there is a $1,000 enrollment fee and a $375 drug evaluation fee for felony charges. For DUI/DWI charges, there is a $1,000 enrollment fee, fees for the required alcohol screening and monitoring, charges for any required services or classes imposed on the defendant, and a $30 monthly administrative fee. Participating in the pretrial diversion program provides a valuable opportunity for a defendant. However, having the chance to be admitted to this program may be difficult since it is strictly up to the prosecutor of the case. Thus, availing of the legal guidance and representation by a reputable criminal lawyer may provide valuable assistance to your cause as they can negotiate with the prosecutor and present reasons that you may be a good candidate for the program. If you or your loved one has been accused of a charge, and would like to know about the chances of getting into a pretrial diversion program, please call (225) 963-9638, or you can click here to contact us for a free consultation. Our highly experienced criminal lawyers can help you assess your case and represent your interests.

Family Law

How Does The Court Determine Child Custody?

/

How Does The Court Determine Child Custody? Another issue in getting divorced or breaking up is the matter of child custody or visitation of minor children. This issue is a sensitive topic and a grave concern for everybody involved. Generally, family courts grant orders that focus on the phrase “best interest of the child” regarding child custody and visitation matters regarding minor children. Given the complex application of the law in the child custody orders, the guidance of a reputable family attorney well-versed in child custody matters is valuable to ensure that your child’s best interest is honored in court. What Does The Term “Best Interest Of The Child” Mean? The term “best interest of the child” is the bottom line in every child custody matter. This phrase means that the court is first to put what is best for the minor children given the circumstances of the case. To determine the child’s best interest, the court assesses the facts of the case and the factors listed by the Louisiana Civil Code 134. What Factors Does The Family Court Consider To Determine Child Custody? The Louisiana Civil Code 134 enumerates the essential factors the family court evaluates and considers to determine a proper child custody order that would serve the child’s best interest. The following factors that the family court must consider and assess to determine how to grant a child custody order that would reflect the best interest of the child are as follows:  The first consideration for the family court is to assess the disposition of the child to be abused in each parent’s custody, as defined by Children’s Code Article 603. Potential to continually foster love, affection, and other emotional ties between each parent and the child. The ability and disposition of each parent to give the child love, affection, and spiritual guidance and to continue to provide education and rearing of the child. The ability of each parent to provide the child with their essential needs such as food, clothing, medical care, and other material necessities. The ability of the child to continue living in a stable environment. Potentially allow the child to have permanence or resemblance of permanence in their living environment by living in the custodial home. The moral fitness of each parent as it relates to and affects the welfare of the child or children. The mental capacity and physical health of each parent. The connection of the home, school, and community to the child. The court may consider the child’s preferences if they are of sufficient age and maturity to express their desires. Assess whether each parent is willing and able to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the child and the other parent. The distance between each parent’s residence. Determine how each parent has previously provided care and rearing to the child. How Does The Family Court Determine Child Custody Or Visitation When There Is A History Of Family Violence? The family court could prohibit custody of a child or limit visitation between a parent and children in child custody cases that involve documented history of family violence, domestic abuse, or sexual abuse. These limitations and prohibitions, as stated in the law, are as follows: The family court would prohibit visitation between the abusive parent and abused child until such parent can prove that any visitation would not cause physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the child. If visitation is granted, the court shall order such restrictions, conditions, and safeguard needed to minimize any risk of injury to the child. Moreover, all costs related to complying with this rule are charged to the abusive parent. A parent whose visitation rights have been subsequently authorized as restricted visitation by the court shall not remove the child from the court’s jurisdiction except if they can show good cause and have obtained prior approval from the court. The presumption is a parent who has a history of committing family violence shall not be awarded sole or joint custody of a child. This presumption shall be overcome by a preponderance of the evidence if the abusive parent: Has completed a treatment program; and Not abusing alcohol or any drug; and If it is in the child’s best interest that the parent actively participates as a custodial parent if the other parent is absent, suffers from mental illness, substance abuse, or other similar circumstances. If both parents have a history of committing family violence, the court shall grant custody solely to the parent who is less likely to continue committing family violence. More so, the court will require the custodial parent to complete a treatment program before granting custody of the child. If necessary for the child’s best interest, the court may award custody to a suitable third person who would not allow access to a violent parent unless ordered by the court. The court shall only allow supervised child visitation with a parent that has a history of committing family violence provided that the said parent has completed a mandated treatment program. The said parent could only be allowed an unsupervised visit by the court if they can show by a preponderance of the evidence that the abusive parent has: Completed a treatment program; and Not abusing alcohol or drugs; and Poses no danger to the welfare of the child; and Unsupervised visitation is in the child’s best interest. The court shall not allow any visitation or contact between a parent that has sexually abused their child until the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence in a contradictory hearing that the abusive parent has: Completed a treatment program specifically designed for sexual abusers; and Supervised visitation is in the child’s best interest. Note that the family court may only find a “history of family violence or domestic abuse” in a case if a reported incident resulted in serious bodily injury or if they find a recurring incident of such violence in the family. Child custody matters are handled in a highly-personalized

Scroll to Top
with GTM: